Representation is not just about who is seen — it is about how they are seen, why they are seen, and what power they hold when they are.
In 2025, marginalized communities — BIPOC, disabled, LGBTQ+, immigrant, neurodivergent, and others — are more visible in media and institutions than ever before.
On the surface, this looks like progress. And in many ways, it is.
But representation alone is not the finish line.
Visibility without power is a façade.
Presence without agency is performance.
The gap between tokenism and true inclusion is a chasm still waiting to be fully bridged.
And if we are serious about building a future rooted in real justice, not branding opportunities, we must move beyond optics toward systemic transformation.
What Is Tokenism?
Tokenism is the practice of making only a symbolic effort to include marginalized individuals — often as a way to appear progressive without making meaningful changes to power structures.
It looks like:
• Hiring one BIPOC employee and spotlighting them on every brochure while maintaining an overwhelmingly white leadership team.
• Featuring a single queer character in a TV show with no real character arc, just to check a “diversity box.”
• Inviting disabled speakers to events but offering no physical or sensory accommodations.
• Claiming commitment to inclusion while tolerating internal cultures of racism, ableism, transphobia, or misogyny.
Tokenism is not inclusion.
It is exploitation dressed as equity.
It uses marginalized people as props to signal virtue, without redistributing power, resources, or decision-making authority.
And it leaves those individuals — the “firsts,” the “onlys,” the “representatives” — isolated, scrutinized, and ultimately disposable when they no longer serve the institution’s image management goals.
Why Tokenism is Harmful
1. It Places an Impossible Burden on Individuals
Tokenized individuals are expected to represent their entire community, educate their peers, and quietly endure microaggressions — all while excelling professionally.
Any mistake is magnified; any discomfort is pathologized.
2. It Shields Institutions from Accountability
By pointing to a few visible faces, institutions deflect criticism without addressing the systemic barriers that remain intact.
3. It Distorts Narratives About Progress
Tokenism creates the illusion that equity has been achieved — while marginalized people continue to face structural exclusion behind the scenes.
4. It Erodes Trust
When representation is shallow, it breeds cynicism.
Communities learn that their presence is valued only when it serves someone else’s branding, not when it challenges power.
Moving Toward True Inclusion
True inclusion is not about optics.
It is about redistribution — of power, resources, opportunities, and voice.
It demands fundamental shifts, not just surface-level adjustments.
Here’s what real inclusion requires:
1. Power-Sharing, Not Just Visibility
Representation without agency is hollow.
Who makes decisions?
Who controls the budget?
Who sets the agenda?
Inclusion means putting marginalized individuals not just on the poster but at the table — with real influence, authority, and support.
It means creating leadership pipelines, mentorship programs, and structural pathways that recognize and dismantle historical exclusion.
2. Representation Across All Levels
True inclusion is not satisfied with one “diverse hire” or one “minority lead.”
It insists on broad, sustained representation at every level:
• Entry-level
• Mid-management
• Executive leadership
• Board governance
• Creative direction
• Policy development
It recognizes that change is not complete until the entire system reflects the diversity of the world it serves.
3. Centering Intersectionality
Representation that only features one-dimensional narratives — the “acceptable” versions of marginalized identities — is not inclusion.
A truly inclusive environment makes space for:
• Queer disabled leaders
• Black neurodivergent creators
• Indigenous trans scholars
• Low-income women of color activists
And it ensures that they are not forced to compartmentalize or “sanitize” their full identities to gain acceptance.
Inclusion that demands conformity is assimilation, not liberation.
4. Creating Cultures of Belonging, Not Just Presence
Inclusion is not simply about opening the door.
It is about asking:
• Is this space designed with everyone’s needs in mind?
• Is this culture safe for dissent, complexity, and authenticity?
• Are marginalized people expected to constantly educate, correct, or adapt — or are their experiences respected as expertise?
Belonging means individuals are valued because of who they are, not in spite of it.
It means marginalized people are not expected to be “grateful” for inclusion. They are recognized as essential.
5. Paying and Promoting Marginalized People Equitably
Visibility without fair compensation is exploitation.
Speaking engagements, media appearances, leadership roles — all must come with equitable pay and advancement opportunities.
Inclusion without economic justice is an empty promise.
Why It’s Hard — and Why We Must Push Anyway
Institutions resist true inclusion because it requires real risk:
• Risking discomfort.
• Risking internal critique.
• Risking loss of monopoly on resources and influence.
It requires those who hold privilege to give up unearned advantages — not out of charity, but out of a commitment to justice.
But avoiding that risk perpetuates the violence inclusion is supposed to heal.
We cannot build movements, workplaces, governments, or cultures rooted in liberation while clinging to the comfort of the status quo.
Real inclusion demands transformation — messy, ongoing, imperfect, but necessary.
Media Matters: Why Representation in Storytelling is Political
The stories we tell — on screens, in books, on stages — shape how we see the world and each other.
When marginalized people are only shown as villains, victims, or sidekicks, it dehumanizes them.
When their stories are filtered through white, cis, able-bodied, straight lenses, it reduces them to caricatures.
Authentic representation requires:
• Marginalized people writing, directing, producing, and editing their own stories.
• Complexity, not tokenism: heroes, villains, dreamers, and doubters across all communities.
• Diversity within groups — recognizing that no identity is monolithic.
Representation is not about fulfilling a quota.
It is about shifting whose humanity is considered worth centering.
Final Reflections: Representation as a Beginning, Not an End
Representation matters.
It can open doors. It can challenge stereotypes. It can affirm identity.
But representation alone is not liberation.
True inclusion is not satisfied with symbolic gestures.
It demands systemic change.
It demands power-sharing.
It demands accountability.
It asks us to move beyond asking, “Who is in the room?”, to “Whose voices shape this space?”
“Whose needs define our priorities?”
“Whose liberation are we willing to fight for even when it is uncomfortable, even when it costs us something?”
Because if inclusion only exists when it is easy, it is not justice — it is marketing.
And the future we are fighting for is far too important to be left to slogans.
It is built in the hard, daily, radical labor of making sure that every story is told, every voice is heard, and every life is honored — not just when it is convenient, but always.
Representation is the spark.
Inclusion is the fire.
And we are here to burn down every barrier until we all belong.
Gemma Ortwerth 
Leave a comment